It's
been a full week now since the new site design was introduced, and despite a
torrent of comments, nothing
has been done to address the problems. Most users have been patient and
super courteous with their suggestions. But polite respect has not resulted in
any improvements. To distill the comments down to the most important issues, we
have the following:
1)  refer black background with white
lettering
2) Return to the essential "recent
updates" list with the "more" button leading
to the "last 50 updated episodes" page
3) More extensive viewing logs with
a "search" function and which don't bloat up
with repeated entries every time you hit 'pause"
4) season/episode + title indicators
when watching an episode to end the guessing game as to where
you are in the season
5) Make up your
mind; is this a Movie site or a TV
site? Combining the two creates impossible-to-navigate
clutter
LBJedward,
your obsession with smartphone users ignores the fact that most users are
viewing on laptop, desktop or larger iPod-type devices. To achieve your
smartphone objective, you have abandoned and betrayed the far greater number of
users who, quite honestly, couldn’t care less about watching TV or movies on a
telephone. If the computer vs smartphone incompatibility is so great, wouldn’t
it make more sense to create a separate site for small-screen users rather than
destroy the proven functionality for everyone else? This new format’s tools won’t
even allow you to implement a “forum”
button. The much loved, user friendly, fully functional ‘old’ VIPTV user
interface is clearly superior to what we are now burdened with.
If you had presented us
with a site upgrade which improved performance and usability, we would all be
cheering you on with glowing comments and rave reviews. As you may have
noticed, this has not been the case. Having read all the postings since the
changeover, I’ve yet to find any positive comments. None! Just an endless train
of polite suggestions for improvements. But let’s face it, lbjEdward, the
length of time it will take to re-code this new UI to implement all those
improvements and approach the refined elegance of the old site…well, it may
outlast the patience of your users. If I were a first-time visitor to the new site,
I would probably feel frustrated confusion, lose interest quickly and surf on.
Besides, the webpage looks like an amateur undertaking. Your vast library
remains unseen, buried beneath the rubble of a chaotic, non-intuitive
interface. But I suppose we can all take heart that it looks better on a
telephone. Admit it– this is an experiment, and we, the users, remain the lab
rats forced to bear the consequences.
Why don’t you give us a
concrete time estimate as to just how long we must wait for this UI to regain
the features we loved but have lost? Be honest with us, please. Don’t just solicit suggestions, implement them.
But always keep in mind the overwhelming advantages of a roll-back to the
previous site format, the user-preferred ‘old’ VipTV. Down the road, once you
actually have an “improved” (and de-bugged) product for us to use, then we can
look at upgrading the system.
Move us forward, Edward,
not backwards.
P.S. I have just discovered that you have/had a mobile site (m.viptv.net), at least as of 2015, while viptv.net was designated as 'the desktop site'. If this is true and you still have a separate mobile site, why did you trash the 'desktop' site? Or do you no longer have a mobile site, having merged the two with the intent of a single, universal platform (which didn't work out)? LBJEdward, your stated reason for this upgrade was Smartphone compatibility. If you do still have the mobile site, why not restrict the "upgrade" to that site only, leaving the desktop site untouched? If you don't still have the mobile site, why don't you get it back and restore viptv.net to the way it was?
This is very confusing, and I wish to know the justification for screwing up our old favorite viptv.net, when a separate solution was available all the while. Someone, please, explain this to me. Am I missing something?