Subject: Flash Site Sucks! [Print This Page] Author: santimar Time: 12-6-2011 12:01 Subject: Flash Site Sucks!
Note: This post has been suppressed by system since the author has been banned or deleted.Author: arksongbird80 Time: 12-6-2011 15:59 Subject: Reply 1#1 santimar's post
I"m having some trouble with the flash site as well. I seem to have better luck with the RP site, but it's not uploaded as quickly. It's a bit annoying. Author: waterlilybarb Time: 12-6-2011 16:14 Subject: Reply 1#1 santimar's post
Since the Flash site is meant to be the main site, it will generally be updated first. The Realplayer site still gets updated. It just gets done later.Author: arksongbird80 Time: 12-7-2011 05:26 Subject: Reply 3#3 waterlilybarb's post
Is there any room for negotiations with the Flash site being primary. I mean, can't we TALK about it..... Author: santimar Time: 12-9-2011 09:41
Note: This post has been suppressed by system since the author has been banned or deleted.Author: spratt89 Time: 12-9-2011 09:53 Subject: Reply 5#5 santimar's post
US Copyright Code Title 17, Chapter 1, § 111. Limitations on exclusive rights: Secondary transmissions, subsection a5:
(a) Certain Secondary Transmissions Exempted.— The secondary transmission of a performance or display of a work embodied in a primary transmission is not an infringement of copyright if—
(5) the secondary transmission is not made by a cable system but is made by a governmental body, or other nonprofit organization, without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage, and without charge to the recipients of the secondary transmission other than assessments necessary to defray the actual and reasonable costs of maintaining and operating the secondary transmission service.
Subsection 3 might also apply but I am not entirely sure as it would apply more to the free side then the VIP side.
(3) the secondary transmission is made by any carrier who has no direct or indirect control over the content or selection of the primary transmission or over the particular recipients of the secondary transmission, and whose activities with respect to the secondary transmission consist solely of providing wires, cables, or other communications channels for the use of others: Provided, That the provisions of this clause extend only to the activities of said carrier with respect to secondary transmissions and do not exempt from liability the activities of others with respect to their own primary or secondary transmissions;
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000111----000-.htmlAuthor: sanggye Time: 12-9-2011 11:06 Subject: Reply 4#4 arksongbird80's post
I fully agree Ark, flash is on it's way out as HTML5 begins, Apple alrady doesn't have flash in it's mobile devices, soon Android won't either. It uses too much bandwidth for me, so when this site loses RealPlayer, I am done with it most likely. it will make me sad. To stya with the times, HTML5 development should have been thought about instead of Flash.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/lous ... ng-long-live-html5/http://www.visionmobile.com/blog ... ears-in-the-making/Author: arksongbird80 Time: 12-9-2011 12:54 Subject: Reply 7#7 sanggye's post
bummer. That would make me sad sanggye. You contribute so much to the site. RP is better. I'm not biased. But my opinion is correct. Author: santimar Time: 12-9-2011 22:38
Note: This post has been suppressed by system since the author has been banned or deleted.Author: fatboy2005 Time: 12-9-2011 23:25 Subject: Points
Flash buffering sucks...there times I have to close out and re-start and I lose points to whatever series I'm watching I thought we didn't lose points if we watched the show within 24 hours? I want my points backAuthor: codebreaker Time: 12-9-2011 23:40 Subject: Reply 10#10 fatboy2005's post
You can get your points back by sending a PM to lbjedward and you are right you shouldn't loose point every time you re-start because you should have 30 clicks in 24 hours before being re-charged Author: spratt89 Time: 12-10-2011 03:53 Subject: Reply 9#9 santimar's post
well I don't see all 250,000 members saying it sucks only a very small amount of people. Author: santimar Time: 12-10-2011 07:48
Note: This post has been suppressed by system since the author has been banned or deleted.Author: woothdye Time: 12-10-2011 07:49
I actually find the image quality much better on flash than real player. I usually have no problems with the buffering unless my isp is suffering outages or I've gone over my download limit Author: spratt89 Time: 12-10-2011 07:50 Subject: Reply 13#13 santimar's post
stop talking for other members as you have no idea what they do, most people are patient and understanding. Author: santimar Time: 12-10-2011 07:54
Note: This post has been suppressed by system since the author has been banned or deleted.Author: spratt89 Time: 12-10-2011 07:59 Subject: Reply 16#16 santimar's post
I have no problem loading episodes on either site and a thread was already created way back when the Flash site first come up with a vote. Author: santimar Time: 12-10-2011 08:02
Note: This post has been suppressed by system since the author has been banned or deleted.Author: spratt89 Time: 12-10-2011 08:03
no when the site was first created it had teething problems which have since been fixed and again you have no idea what site people are watching Author: santimar Time: 12-10-2011 08:06
Note: This post has been suppressed by system since the author has been banned or deleted.Author: spratt89 Time: 12-10-2011 08:09 Subject: Reply 20#20 santimar's post
No I don't know what site their watching but I don't go around trying to talk for other members and I will keep moderating this post as its my job to do so. Author: codebreaker Time: 12-10-2011 08:46 Subject: Reply 21#21 spratt89's post
I was just looking at the viewing stats for American Horror Story in the 12 days on the rp site it's had over 600 and in the 3 or 4 days on the flash site over 200 so i think it's about even but I'm not looking forward to the time we only have one choice Author: arksongbird80 Time: 12-10-2011 08:50 Subject: Reply 20#20 santimar's post
Santimar: being annoyed with the site is one thing and Adam has a right to defend the decisions made. You being a JackA isn't appropriate. If you want to be beligerant because you aren't receiving a product you like, go elsewhere. You do have other options. You patronage isn't needed at this site and your attitude isn't needed at this forum.
Thank you for your opinion, it's been noted. Now find another soap box. Author: waterlilybarb Time: 12-10-2011 16:09 Subject: Reply 23#23 arksongbird80's post
Thank you arksong for being supportive of the moderators and letting santimar know that rudeness is not appropriate or tolerated on this site. Newer people need to take a moment to read the forum rules before posting, especially if they intend to be so rude.
We welcome legitimate complaints and do our best to address them, but posts like santimar's in post #20 clearly are more attacks than complaints.
Welcome to FriendVista.com (http://friendvista.com/forum/)
It's a bit annoying. 
